This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
lecture_notes:05-16-2011 [2011/05/16 21:45] eyliaw created |
lecture_notes:05-16-2011 [2011/06/13 00:40] (current) karplus Added "lecture notes" to title. |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== Seqprep ====== | + | ====== Seqprep lecture notes ====== |
| + | Phred: | ||
| + | * 66 -> 0 (33) (Or not... makes sense to not have 0) | ||
| + | * 33 - 64 = -31 in most cases | ||
| + | |||
| + | Systematic base-calling biases in Illumina exist. I.e. read one thing going one way, something else going the other. | ||
| + | |||
| How does Seqprep do error correction? | How does Seqprep do error correction? | ||
| Line 7: | Line 14: | ||
| = -10 * log_10(1-P(Y=x|Xi=x)) | = -10 * log_10(1-P(Y=x|Xi=x)) | ||
| - | Phred: | + | Quality of our base call based on an alignment: Q1 (quality of read 1), Q2 (quality of read 2), Qa (alignment quality). |
| - | 66 -> 0 (33) | + | |
| - | 33 - 64 = -31 in most cases | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Systematic base-calling biases in Illumina exist. I.e. read one thing going one way, something else going the other. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Quality of an alignment: Q1 (quality of read 1), Q2 (quality of read 2), Qa (alignment quality: agree and disagree). | + | |
| If we assume that the alignment is perfect: | If we assume that the alignment is perfect: | ||
| * Bases 1 and 2 agree: Q1 + Q2 | * Bases 1 and 2 agree: Q1 + Q2 | ||
| * Bases 1 and 2 disagree: Q1 - Q2? | * Bases 1 and 2 disagree: Q1 - Q2? | ||
| - | * (1 - P1)(2/3( | ||