User Tools

Site Tools


lecture_notes:03-30-2011

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
lecture_notes:03-30-2011 [2011/03/30 23:05]
eyliaw created
lecture_notes:03-30-2011 [2011/04/01 03:45]
svohr [Pac Bio]
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 Inputs: ​ Sequencing data from various machines. ​ Some of the characteristics of these machines/​techniques:​ Inputs: ​ Sequencing data from various machines. ​ Some of the characteristics of these machines/​techniques:​
-  * Sanger capillary +==== Sanger capillary ​==== 
-  * 454 +  * ~800bp reads[(cite:​wikisanger>​http://​en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​Microfluidic_Sanger_sequencing)]. 
-  * SoLiD +  * Q (quality value) ~30 
-  * Illumina +  * ~$1/read, expensive because primers must be attached to each read. 
-  * * +==== 454 ==== 
-  * Ion Torrent +  * ~400bp reads[(cite:​wiki454>​http://​en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​454_Life_Sciences)]. 
-  * Pac Bio+  * Pyrosequencing 
 +  * Q ~20 
 +  * $5000/​run/​1M reads, no downscaling (numbers approximate). 
 +==== SoLiD ==== 
 +  * 2x25bp or 1x50bp reads 
 +  * Paired end reads: ​ ligation with adapter, cleaves 25bp from adapter using restriction enzyme. 
 +  * Potential for double ligation: two unrelated sequences ligating. 
 +  * $2000/​run/​100M reads (numbers approximate). 
 +==== Illumina ​==== 
 +  * 2x50, 2x100bps ? 
 +  ​Paired end reads 
 +  * Potential errors: innies (ligated region not between sequenced regions) or chimeric (sequence passes ligated region) 
 +  * Cheaper than SoLiD, 10K Genomes project uses it. 
 +==== Ion Torrent ==== 
 + 
 +==== Pac Bio ==== 
 +  * Very long, single molecule reads (~10K) 
 +  * High error rates (~5%) 
 +  * Useful when mapping to a reference. 
 +===== References ===== 
 +<​refnotes>​notes-separator:​ none</​refnotes>​ 
 +~~REFNOTES cite~~
lecture_notes/03-30-2011.txt · Last modified: 2011/04/01 19:20 by svohr