User Tools

Site Tools


lecture_notes:04-05-2010

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
lecture_notes:04-05-2010 [2010/04/07 18:22]
galt
lecture_notes:04-05-2010 [2010/04/16 00:46]
learithe
Line 29: Line 29:
   * SOLiD System Tools (Corona_lite,​ etc): Hyunsung and Chris   * SOLiD System Tools (Corona_lite,​ etc): Hyunsung and Chris
   * Newbler documentation:​ Galt and Herbert   * Newbler documentation:​ Galt and Herbert
 +  * SOAPdenovo: Galt and Jenny
  
  
 +Assembly Review Articles:
 +  * [[http://​www.sciencedirect.com/​science?​_ob=ArticleURL&​_udi=B6WG1-4YJ6GD8-1&​_user=10&​_coverDate=03%2F06%2F2010&​_rdoc=1&​_fmt=high&​_orig=search&​_sort=d&​_docanchor=&​view=c&​_searchStrId=1282691739&​_rerunOrigin=google&​_acct=C000050221&​_version=1&​_urlVersion=0&​_userid=10&​md5=32c08d11cc10fd1eefca0f8a8def738b|Assembly algorithms for next-generation sequencing data]]
  
-[[Review Article | http://​www.sciencedirect.com/​science?​_ob=ArticleURL&​_udi=B6WG1-4YJ6GD8-1&​_user=10&​_coverDate=03%2F06%2F2010&​_rdoc=1&​_fmt=high&​_orig=search&​_sort=d&​_docanchor=&​view=c&​_searchStrId=1282691739&​_rerunOrigin=google&​_acct=C000050221&​_version=1&​_urlVersion=0&​_userid=10&​md5=32c08d11cc10fd1eefca0f8a8def738b]]+  Jason R. Miller, Sergey Koren and Granger Suttona 
 +   
 +  Covers these assemblers: SSAKE, SHARCGS, VCAKE, Newbler, Celera, Euler, Velvet, ABySS, AllPaths, and SOAPdenovo. 
 +   
 +  Compares de Bruijn graph to overlap/​layout/​consensus. 
 +   
 +  Jason R. Miller, Sergey Koren, Granger Sutton, Assembly algorithms for next-generation sequencing data, Genomics,  
 +  In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 6 March 2010, ISSN 0888-7543, DOI: 10.1016/​j.ygeno.2010.03.001. 
 +  (http://​www.sciencedirect.com/​science/article/B6WG1-4YJ6GD8-1/​2/​ae6c957910e4ea658cdebff4a0ce9793) 
 +  Keywords: Genome assembly algorithms; Next-generation sequencing
  
-Assembly algorithms for next-generation sequencing data 
  
-Jason R. Miller, Sergey Korena and Granger Suttona 
- 
-SSAKE, SHARCGS, VCAKE, Newbler, Celera Assembler, Euler, Velvet, ABySS, 
-AllPaths, and SOAPdenovo. 
- 
-More generally, it compares the two standard methods known as the de 
-Bruijn graph approach and 
-the overlap/​layout/​consensus approach to assembly. 
  
 =====Assembly Overview===== =====Assembly Overview=====
Line 67: Line 70:
       * Expect half your reads to have an error in them.       * Expect half your reads to have an error in them.
   * Contiguous chromosomes with a low error rate ( output from assemblers).   * Contiguous chromosomes with a low error rate ( output from assemblers).
-    * Miami standard for a finished genome should have an error rate of 1 x 10^-5 bases.+    * Bermuda ​standard for a finished genome should have an error rate of 1 x 10^-5 bases. ​(see comment below)
     * To reduce error rate in short reads, stack up many reads and take the most common base at each position.     * To reduce error rate in short reads, stack up many reads and take the most common base at each position.
   * How much data do we have?   * How much data do we have?
lecture_notes/04-05-2010.txt · Last modified: 2010/04/16 01:16 by karplus