User Tools

Site Tools


lecture_notes:04-05-2010

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
lecture_notes:04-05-2010 [2010/04/05 22:17]
hyjkim
lecture_notes:04-05-2010 [2010/04/13 14:27]
learithe
Line 9: Line 9:
   * Create the wiki page about them   * Create the wiki page about them
   * And possibly install them   * And possibly install them
 +
 +Volunteers:
 +  * Phrap: Galt and Shyamini
 +  * Velvet: Hyunsung and Galt 
 +  * ABySS: Galt and Chris
 +  * AMOS: Shyamini and Herbert
 +  * Arachne: John and Michael
 +  * CAP3/PCAT: Michael and Galt
 +  * Celera: Shyamini and Hyunsung
 +  * Euler/​Euler-sr:​ Herbert and John
 +  * MIRA1: Herbert and Michael
 +  * TIGR Assembler: John and Shyamini
 +  * SHARCGS: Michael and Chris
 +  * SSAKE: Herbert and Hyunsung
 +  * Staden gap4 package: Michael and Hyunsung
 +  * VCAKE: Chris and John
 +  * Phusion: Shyamini and Michael
 +  * QSRA: Herbert and Chris
 +  * SOLiD System Tools (Corona_lite,​ etc): Hyunsung and Chris
 +  * Newbler documentation:​ Galt and Herbert
 +  * SOAPdenovo: Galt and Jenny
 +
 +
 +Assembly Review Articles:
 +  * [[http://​www.sciencedirect.com/​science?​_ob=ArticleURL&​_udi=B6WG1-4YJ6GD8-1&​_user=10&​_coverDate=03%2F06%2F2010&​_rdoc=1&​_fmt=high&​_orig=search&​_sort=d&​_docanchor=&​view=c&​_searchStrId=1282691739&​_rerunOrigin=google&​_acct=C000050221&​_version=1&​_urlVersion=0&​_userid=10&​md5=32c08d11cc10fd1eefca0f8a8def738b|Assembly algorithms for next-generation sequencing data]]
 +
 +  Jason R. Miller, Sergey Koren and Granger Suttona
 +  ​
 +  Covers these assemblers: SSAKE, SHARCGS, VCAKE, Newbler, Celera, Euler, Velvet, ABySS, AllPaths, and SOAPdenovo.
 +  ​
 +  Compares de Bruijn graph to overlap/​layout/​consensus.
 +  ​
 +  Jason R. Miller, Sergey Koren, Granger Sutton, Assembly algorithms for next-generation sequencing data, Genomics, ​
 +  In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 6 March 2010, ISSN 0888-7543, DOI: 10.1016/​j.ygeno.2010.03.001.
 +  (http://​www.sciencedirect.com/​science/​article/​B6WG1-4YJ6GD8-1/​2/​ae6c957910e4ea658cdebff4a0ce9793)
 +  Keywords: Genome assembly algorithms; Next-generation sequencing
 +
 +
  
 =====Assembly Overview===== =====Assembly Overview=====
Line 32: Line 70:
       * Expect half your reads to have an error in them.       * Expect half your reads to have an error in them.
   * Contiguous chromosomes with a low error rate ( output from assemblers).   * Contiguous chromosomes with a low error rate ( output from assemblers).
-    * Miami standard for a finished genome should have an error rate of 1 x 10^-5 bases.+    * Miami standard for a finished genome should have an error rate of 1 x 10^-5 bases. ​FIXME
     * To reduce error rate in short reads, stack up many reads and take the most common base at each position.     * To reduce error rate in short reads, stack up many reads and take the most common base at each position.
   * How much data do we have?   * How much data do we have?
lecture_notes/04-05-2010.txt ยท Last modified: 2010/04/16 01:16 by karplus