This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
lecture_notes:03-30-2011 [2011/03/30 23:05] eyliaw |
lecture_notes:03-30-2011 [2011/04/01 03:45] svohr [Pac Bio] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Inputs: Sequencing data from various machines. Some of the characteristics of these machines/techniques: | Inputs: Sequencing data from various machines. Some of the characteristics of these machines/techniques: | ||
- | ===== Sanger capillary ===== | + | ==== Sanger capillary ==== |
+ | * ~800bp reads[(cite:wikisanger>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microfluidic_Sanger_sequencing)]. | ||
+ | * Q (quality value) ~30 | ||
+ | * ~$1/read, expensive because primers must be attached to each read. | ||
+ | ==== 454 ==== | ||
+ | * ~400bp reads[(cite:wiki454>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/454_Life_Sciences)]. | ||
+ | * Pyrosequencing | ||
+ | * Q ~20 | ||
+ | * $5000/run/1M reads, no downscaling (numbers approximate). | ||
+ | ==== SoLiD ==== | ||
+ | * 2x25bp or 1x50bp reads | ||
+ | * Paired end reads: ligation with adapter, cleaves 25bp from adapter using restriction enzyme. | ||
+ | * Potential for double ligation: two unrelated sequences ligating. | ||
+ | * $2000/run/100M reads (numbers approximate). | ||
+ | ==== Illumina ==== | ||
+ | * 2x50, 2x100bps ? | ||
+ | * Paired end reads | ||
+ | * Potential errors: innies (ligated region not between sequenced regions) or chimeric (sequence passes ligated region) | ||
+ | * Cheaper than SoLiD, 10K Genomes project uses it. | ||
+ | ==== Ion Torrent ==== | ||
- | 454 | + | ==== Pac Bio ==== |
- | SoLiD | + | * Very long, single molecule reads (~10K) |
- | Illumina | + | * High error rates (~5%) |
- | Ion Torrent | + | * Useful when mapping to a reference. |
- | Pac Bio | + | ===== References ===== |
+ | <refnotes>notes-separator: none</refnotes> | ||
+ | ~~REFNOTES cite~~ |