User Tools

Site Tools


banana_slug_biology

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
banana_slug_biology [2010/04/25 19:58]
hyjkim
banana_slug_biology [2010/04/26 20:31]
karplus added Google Scholar hits
Line 27: Line 27:
  
 To find the rather sparse literature on //A. dolichophallus//​ requires doing sensitive literature searches, then weeding the results to get higher specificity. ​ This section should list searches tried, how many hits they got, and what sort of specificity they had.  The results should be collected in the Annotated Bibliography section. To find the rather sparse literature on //A. dolichophallus//​ requires doing sensitive literature searches, then weeding the results to get higher specificity. ​ This section should list searches tried, how many hits they got, and what sort of specificity they had.  The results should be collected in the Annotated Bibliography section.
 +
 +  * Google Books search ​
 +    * //​dolichophallus//​ as the sole keyword gets 147 hits.  Many of them are not relevant (wrong genus). ​
 +    * //​dolichophallus -xenophthalmodes//​ reduces the hits to 129
 +    * //​dolichophallus -xenophthalmodes -brioptera -"x dolichophallus"//​ reduces the hits to 125.  Not all are relevant, but it looks like at least half are.  I have not added these to the list below, but I recommend that one of the students start doing so. --- //​[[karplus@soe.ucsc.edu|Kevin Karplus]] 2010/04/26 13:14//
 +    * //​ariolimax//​ as the sole keyword gets 739 hits---probably too many for us to process.
 +    * //ariolimax dolichophallus//​ gets 47 hits, which are probably all relevant.
 +  * Google scholar search
 +    * //ariolimax dolichophallus//​ gets 48 hits, which are probably all relevant. ​ There is most likely some overlap with the Google Books search.
 +    * //​ariolimax//​ alone gets 743 hits---again too many for us.
 +    * //​dolichiphallus//​ alone gets 73, some of which are wrong genus.
 +
 ===== Annotated Bibliography ===== ===== Annotated Bibliography =====
  
Line 118: Line 130:
   * **The Evolution of male and female reproductive traits in simultaneously hermaphroditic terrestrial gastropods**[(cite:​reproductive_traits>​   * **The Evolution of male and female reproductive traits in simultaneously hermaphroditic terrestrial gastropods**[(cite:​reproductive_traits>​
 The Evolution of male and female reproductive traits in simultaneously hermaphroditic terrestrial gastropods.\\ The Evolution of male and female reproductive traits in simultaneously hermaphroditic terrestrial gastropods.\\
-Kathleen Beese, Doctoral thesis:​2003-2007. Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Switzerland.\\+Kathleen Beese, Doctoral thesis:​2003-2007. Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, ​Switzerland.\\
 url: [[http://​edoc.unibas.ch/​577/​1/​DissB_7878.pdf]].)] url: [[http://​edoc.unibas.ch/​577/​1/​DissB_7878.pdf]].)]
  
-  ​* **The Edibility of Polygyra and Ariolimax** A short note of a German man from Clark County Oregon who claims Ariolimax Columbianus has "good flavor"​ after proper preparation. The slug is washed in dillute vinegar to remove slime, cleaned like a fish and fried in butter. [(cite:​Ariolimax_palatibility>​+ 
 + 
 +==== Ariolimax Columbianus and Ariolimax Californicus ==== 
 +  ​* **The Edibility of Polygyra and Ariolimax** A short note of a German man from Clark County Oregon who claims ​//Ariolimax Columbianus// has "good flavor"​ after proper preparation. The slug is washed in dillute vinegar to remove slime, cleaned like a fish and fried in butter. [(cite:​Ariolimax_palatibility>​
 Allen, J.A. 1916. Edibility of Polygyra and Ariolimax. Nautilus 29, 143.\\ Allen, J.A. 1916. Edibility of Polygyra and Ariolimax. Nautilus 29, 143.\\
 url: [[http://​biodiversitylibrary.org/​page/​1815918]].)] url: [[http://​biodiversitylibrary.org/​page/​1815918]].)]
-