**This is an old revision of the document!** ----
====== Review Articles ====== ===== Assembler review articles ====== ** Assembly algorithms for next-generation sequencing data **[(cite:assem_alg>Jason R. Miller, Sergey Koren, Granger Sutton. Assembly algorithms for next-generation sequencing data. //Genomics//, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 6 March 2010. ISSN 0888-7543. doi:[[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2010.03.001|10.1016/j.ygeno.2010.03.001]].)] Covers these assemblers: SSAKE, SHARCGS, VCAKE, Newbler, Celera, Euler, Velvet, ABySS, AllPaths, and SOAPdenovo. Compares de Bruijn graph to overlap/layout/consensus. ===== References ===== <refnotes>notes-separator: none</refnotes> ~~REFNOTES cite~~
Discussion
References should use the refnotes plugin (see the style page)
The formatting has been fixed; everyone please follow the new format. Use the level 2 header ( ====== ) for the categorization of review articles (e.g. Assembler review articles) and use bold for paper titles followed by a RefNotes citation for that paper (the paper titles use bold since the heading syntax does not work when followed by a RefNotes citation). When adding new review articles, please place them in alphabetical order. Any notes or information about the review article follows the title and reference for the paper.
The link works for me, but then I created it.
You can also try the link that appears further down in the citation:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WG1-4YJ6GD8-1/2/ae6c957910e4ea658cdebff4a0ce9793
Of course, if you are off-campus, you will need to use OCA Bookmarkelet from library with your library card, or some other UCSC library mechanism.
Broken link?
Actually, if someone knows a better way to format this, please help.
If we also include a section header, then once we get a lot of articles on this page there will be a table of contents linking to everything.